Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Jun 12, 2002

About Us
Contact Us
National
News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

National

HC cautions CBI on filing fresh chargesheet against Hindujas

By J. Venkatesan

NEW DELHI JUNE 11. While quashing the chargesheet against the three Hinduja brothers in the `Bofors case' on Monday, the Delhi High Court has cautioned the CBI on the expediency of launching a fresh prosecution in view of the long delay and death of the main accused and other facts.

Justice R.S. Sodhi, drew the attention of the CBI to the contention of the former Union Law Minister, Ram Jethmalani, senior counsel for the petitioners — Srichand, Prakshchand and Gopichand — about the long delay in filing the main and supplementary chargesheets against the accused and how the trial court had treated both chargesheets as one.

The Judge also pointed out about the report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) which went into the allegations elaborately and submitted its report on April 26, 1988. According to the JPC report, no corruption was involved in the Bofors gun deal; no money had been paid to any Indian agent and the guns were the best possible and the price paid was the lowest.

Further the death of the main accused, S.K. Bhatnagar, former Defence Secretary and Win Chadha, Dubai-based former Bofors agent; the CBI's admissions in their correspondence with the Swiss authorities; the Swiss Federal Police's representation to the Swiss judge, on the basis of which further materials were supplied.

The Judge was also of the view that according to the petitioners' contention earning commission was neither illegal nor morally wrong. He also pointed out the fact that the Union Cabinet had recently sanctioned that employment of agents and payments of commission in defence deals.

The Judge said it would be open to the CBI to consider the feasibility of carrying on with this case in view of the above circumstances and in accordance with law.

The Court rejected the contention of the CBI that reporting to the Central Vigilance Commission would hamper investigation and quashed the chargesheet against the Hindujas as the CBI had not obtained approval from the CVC before filing the chargesheet.

It noted that the CVC was not required to interfere in the investigation but it was certainly required to review the results of investigation before the same was placed before the Court.

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

National

News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Copyright © 2002, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu