Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, Jun 27, 2002

About Us
Contact Us
Front Page
News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

Front Page

CBI plea in Bofors case

NEW DELHI JUNE 26. The CBI today filed a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court's June 10 order quashing the chargesheet against the Hinduja brothers in the Rs. 64-crore Bofors payoff case, CBI sources here said. — PTI

No power for CVC to monitor probe: CBI

By Our Legal Correspondent

NEW DELHI JUNE 26. The CBI today filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court against a judgment of the Delhi High Court quashing the chargesheet filed against the three Hindjuja brothers in the "Rs. 64 crore Bofors pay-off case" on the ground that the agency had not obtained the consent of the Central Vigilance Commission before filing the chargesheet.

In its SLP, the CBI said the High Court had erred in holding that the directions in the case of Vineet Narain case required that the CVC should review the results of investigation before the same were placed before the court as there was no such direction in the judgment.

The CBI submitted that the High Court failed to note that the directions were merely that the CBI would report to the CVC and no power was conferred upon the CVC to monitor investigation.

Once investigation had begun, it was incumbent upon the investigating agency to file a report in the court and no person or authority had the right to interfere in the working of the agency.

Without any allegation, much less material, the High Court had erred in holding that it could not be unmindful of the fact that the CBI had been under a cloud.

The procedure was meant to further the ends of justice and not to frustrate the same.

While quashing the chargesheet, the High Court had made it clear that the bail granted to the Hinduja brothers— Srichand, Gopichand and Prakashchand— and the condition imposed by the Supreme Court that at least one of them should remain in India at any point of time would remain intact.

The Judge had said that "it was for the CVC to ensure that a half-baked incomplete chargesheet was not filed shielding the high and the mighty nor was a frivolous chargesheet filed to achieve any oblique motive of the high and the mighty.''

The CBI sought a direction to set aside the impugned judgment dated June 10 and a stay of its operation.

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Front Page

News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Copyright © 2002, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu