![]() Thursday, Jul 04, 2002 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Staff Reporter
Mr. Mallya, who appeared before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, rebutted all the accusations insisting that he had been co-operating with the investigating agency all through the probe. When the ACMM asked him whether it was correct that he had been summoned by a chief enforcement officer for his appearance on September 27 along with his passport and documents relating to the remittance of foreign exchange to Britain and that he had refused to comply, Mr. Mallya denied the charge saying that he had received the summons after the due date for appearance, yet his office responded to the summons despite his not being in India. To another query, he said he had appeared before the Special Director, K.R. Bhargava, on a show cause notice. After hearing the main case of FERA violation, Mr. Bhargava had discharged him and his company of all the allegations framed by the Directorate. However, the ACMM had on May 15 dismissed Mr. Mallya's application for discharge in the non-compliance case, which the accused had requested on the ground of his discharge in the main case.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|