![]() Saturday, Aug 17, 2002 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
Deposing before the Liberhan Commission of Inquiry probing the December 6, 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid, Mahant Avaidyanath said: ``The court may give any verdict but Hindu society and karsevaks will not be able to accept it as this is a matter of faith for them. If the court says that a particular man is not your father, will a person who is considering the man his father since birth and addressing him so accept it? Similar is the case of the `Ram janmabhoomi'.'' He justified the demolition saying that Babar had forcibly demolished the original temple and constructed a mosque in its place. So if the strong Hindu society favoured demolition of the mosque by force and constructing a Ram temple in its place there was nothing wrong or illegal about it. ``It was not possible to demolish the structure so quickly with raw hands. There were some engineers and experts among the karsevaks who said that they should strike the lower wall of the disputed structure with the rods used for barricading.'' But Mahant Avaidyanath said that though a large number of policemen was present on the occasion, many of them after discarding their uniform joined in the demolition work and lost their jobs subsequently.
He claimed that many policemen also wanted the temple to be constructed. UNI
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|