![]() Wednesday, Nov 06, 2002 |
| Other States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Other States
-
Jammu & Kashmir
By Our Special Correspondent
In fact, there was just a hint of warning in what Mr. Jaitley said today when he pointed out that militant outfits such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba had been banned by the Centre (under POTA) and it was the duty of the State Government to ensure that not only the members of the banned organisations but also those who helped them in any way were arrested. Intercepts of telephone conversations were also to be made under POTA. Will the State Government decision not to use POTA mean that the Mufti Sayeed Government will let activists of these dreaded organisations go scot free? In short, indirectly Mr. Jaitley expressed fears that the new Government would be soft towards militants, even the hardcore terrorists among them. The party was also critical of the Samajwadi Party leader, Mulayam Singh Yadav, blaming him for ``dragging'' the name of the Uttar Pradesh Governor, Vishnu Kant Shastri, into the political controversy in the State. Why should Mr. Yadav make allegations against the Governor when it was clear to all that the Congress had not responded to his appeal for help and support and he had not been able to get the numbers together to bring down the Mayawati Government or legitimately claim support for an alternative formation?
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|