![]() Sunday, Nov 24, 2002 |
| Front Page | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Front Page
By J. Venkatesan
Justice Venkataswami declined comment when asked for the reasons for putting in his papers. His resignation at the crucial stage of hearing in the Tehelka probe has taken legal circles by surprise. Though he was appointed chairman of the Authority on Excise and Customs in May this year, the issue surfaced in Parliament only on Friday when members criticised the Government for violating all norms of constitutional propriety in offering a second post to him when the Tehelka enquiry was yet to be completed. According to sources, Justice Venkataswami was unhappy with the handling of the issue by the Government, which, he felt, did not defend his appointment properly though everything had been done in accordance with law and as per the recommendations of the Chief Justice of India. The Venkataswami Commission was constituted by the Centre on March 24 last year to probe the Tehelka portal's expose on corruption in defence deals. And to find out whether there was deviation in the purchase procedures and whether the imperatives of national security were taken into consideration in defence transactions. Initially appointed for four months, its term was extended time and again and the present term is due to expire on January 23 next. The examination of crucial witnesses, including the Defence Minister, George Fernandes, the former BJP president, Bangaru Laxman, the former Samata Party president, Jaya Jaitly, and other Section 8-B witnesses has been completed. The panel included the financial aspect in the probe after the Centre accused the Tehelka portal of being responsible for the crash in the share market after March last, and pleaded with the Commission to include the aspect. With the probe nearing a critical stage of investigation, Justice Venkataswami's resignation has put a question mark on the fate of the Commission, which was intended to arrive at the truth in the portal's "revelations."
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|