![]() Friday, Jan 10, 2003 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Andhra Pradesh
By Our Staff Reporter
Even Som Dutt Builders Limited (SDBL), executing the State Highway-5 between Puthalapattu and Naidupet, had to incur the public wrath. In all, two and a half acres of land was acquired from eight farmers of the village. Chiranjeevulu, an elementary school teacher, said in his representation said that against the market value of Rs. 4 lakhs, a compensation of Rs.45,000 was paid to him for the land, and Rs.24,000 towards the standing sugarcane crop, open well and banana trees. He submitted memoranda to officials and ministers of R&B and revenue wings, but to no avail. The villagers said they handed over their land to the Government feeling that the highway would bring fortune to their village, but were disenchanted with the ill-treatment. They said they were not provided any document on the details of the amount paid to them, nor were their plea for a re-survey taken note of. Also, a bridge coming up near the village became the bone of contention for a further tiff with officials. The villagers rued that the bridge coming up across the Swarnamukhi river at an altitude of 23 ft, to which the approach roads were being heightened with a high gradient, would make it tough for their bullock-carts and tractors cross the road. The villagers alleged that another culvert was built, that forced a diversion of the stream from its normal course of flow into their fields. However, they could not attract a concrete assurance from officials.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|