Sunday, Jan 12, 2003
Sunday, Jan 12, 2003 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Tamil Nadu
By Our Legal Correspondent
A Bench, comprising Justice S. Rajendra Babu, Justice P. Venkatarama Reddi and Justice G.P. Mathur, dismissed the petition, which was directed against an order of the Madras High Court rejecting her plea. In August 2001, the apex court while declining to entertain a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution gave the petitioner liberty to move the High Court, which later dismissed her plea. The petitioner, Saeeda Irfana, submitted that there was ample proof of ``registration of false cases'' against her husband and his brothers and that cases had been registered against them for illegal and extraneous consideration. Claiming that the ``transcripts and tapes'' of the conversation among officials of the Chief Minister's office, police officers and her husband, P.K. Salahuddin, were enclosed in the petition, she prayed for quashing the FIR and for a direction to order a CBI inquiry.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|
