![]() Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 |
| Other States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Other States
-
New Delhi
By Our Staff Reporter
The Consumer Coordination Council (CCC) claims that WLL mobile advertisements require consumers to buy overpriced handsets exclusively from them or their own vendors, which was a clear case of unfair trade practice as defined by the Consumer Protection Act 1986. It has, therefore, urged the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to intervene to protect consumer interests. ``The schemes provided by both the mobile-providers should be made transparent and easy to understand for consumers,'' stated director, CCC, S. Krishnan. The companies cannot claim "lower rates'', as WLL mobile operators get at least Rs. 2,000 as premium from the sale of hand-sets, he added. Under the provisions provided in the Consumer Act, no consumer can be forced to buy a product from a particular seller under duress. No seller can have a monopoly on a particular product, according to consumer activists.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|