![]() Friday, Mar 14, 2003 |
| Other States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Other States
-
New Delhi
By Our Staff Reporter
Playing it safe, Inder Singh took his HMT watch to the company's workshop for repairs. He paid Rs. 145 in advance but found that even after "repairs'' his watch did not function properly. Demanding a refund, he took the company to court. A New Delhi consumer court held HMT liable for deficiency of service and directed the company to refund the amount charged from Mr. Singh along with the costs and damages of Rs. 500. It took Mr. Singh an year to get his Rs. 145 refund. Curiously enough, though, the original makers of the watch could not fix it. It took a local shop to set the time right for less than half the price. To make matters worse, HMT did not even show up for the hearing of the case. A bench presided by L.C. Jain of the New Delhi Consumer Court held that the allegations made by Mr. Singh have not been "rebutted'' by HMT. "The statements made by Mr. Singh are genuine as he has the receipt which shows that he paid for the repairs. So not repairing the watch properly and then demanding the charges, amounts to deficiency of service and HMT is liable.''
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|