![]() Sunday, Mar 30, 2003 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Amit Baruah
"...if Pakistan did not have a role in this (Nadimarg) carnage... then dialogue with Pakistan in this particular case does not make sense. If Pakistan is not responsible, then why talk to Pakistan," he said about a recent American statement urging dialogue between India and Pakistan. "If Pakistan has a role, then that role should call for its condemnation, especially from a country which decided to go to war against a country for the avowed purpose, howsoever weak that case may be, to fight terrorism and protect its citizens. That's why we responded by saying that if dialogue was the solution for all such situations, then a dialogue with Iraq was also called for. I am glad that position has been corrected by their subsequent statement."
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|