![]() Monday, Mar 31, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The Deputy Prime Minister, L.K. Advani, has given Haren Pandya's murder a terrorist colour. But why would terrorists kill a low-profile former State Minister? It is often seen that terrorists generally strike at places where they can target a large number of people such as trains, buses or places of worship, which help in attaining their objective of terrorising people? How can a single killing benefit them? The terrorist strikes are aimed at creating unrest and chaos in society but Pandya's murder would not serve this purpose. So, Mr. Advani's argument that the incident is not politically motivated but the handiwork of terrorists does not hold water.
Shraddha Maheshwari,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|