![]() Tuesday, Apr 29, 2003 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Legal Correspondent
A Bench, comprising Justice M.B. Shah and Justice Arun Kumar, said that as the recording of evidence was in the final stages and 72 witnesses had been examined and only four more were left, no interference with the High Court order was called for at this stage. Senior counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for Mr. Shah, said that for one year his client's plea had been hanging and no court was ready to hear it. There was not even a whisper, as per prosecution evidence, that Mr. Shah had conspired at any point of time to eliminate film stars. Further, his grievance that the charge had been framed wrongly was not being addressed by the courts. Appearing for the prosecution, senior counsel K.T.S. Tulsi said there was enough evidence against the accused relating to conspiracy and that whether or not there was a conspiracy could be determined only after completion of the recording of evidence. The Bench said the High Court order would not be disturbed and the trial court would act in accordance with the order. The trial court had held that Mr. Shah's plea would be considered only at the end of the examination of witnesses and this was upheld by the High Court. The appeal was directed against the High Court order.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|