![]() Wednesday, May 07, 2003 |
| Front Page | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Front Page
By Girish Menon
Reacting to the question whether his position on the ban was an embarrassment to the Congress leadership, Mr. Antony said his party had not taken any national decision on banning the `trishul' distribution. The State Government felt that the ban would not serve any purpose other than giving the VHP's programme unwarranted attention. He emphasised Kerala's politics was vastly different from that of other States. Besides, the West Bengal and Tripura Governments had not banned the "trishul diksha" programme. It was but natural for political parties to take positions suiting the regional interests of the respective States. This difference could be seen in the CPI(M)'s policy towards multinational companies. "In Kerala, the CPI(M) is running a campaign against Pepsi and Coca Cola, but its Government in West Bengal has given sanction to these companies to operate factories,'' he observed.
Related Stories:
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|