![]() Thursday, May 22, 2003 |
| Other States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Other States
-
New Delhi
By Our Staff Reporter
Most of the witnesses produced by the prosecution so far in the court for their deposition have refused to support the police version of the killing. Another prosecution witness today turned hostile refusing to identify any of the accused who were present in the court. He also failed to identify the deceased, Nitish Katara, in a photograph of him shown to him (witness) by the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP), S.K. Saxena. The witness, Umesh Sharma, was at that time working in a private security agency. According to the Ghaziabad police, Sharma had been put on duty at Diamond Palace in Kavi Nagar in Ghaziabad where Nitish Katara along with his friends had gathered to take part in the marriage of his friend, Shivani Gaur, on February 16, 2002. Katara had been kidnapped from the marriage ceremony. The police alleged that Vikas Yadav and his cousin Vishal Yadav, son and nephew of the Rajya Sabha Member, D.P. Yadav, had kidnapped Nitish Katara from the Diamond Place before his body was found in a badly mutilated shape in Bulandshahar district in Uttar Pradesh. The witness said that the Ghaziabad police had not recorded his statement. It had only interrogated him and his father, Sharma said.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|