![]() Saturday, Jun 21, 2003 |
| National | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Special Correspondent
The report, in the Signposts column of the June 23 issue alleged that Mr. Jaitly and four other unnamed persons had been charged with embezzlement by the State Vigilance Department. In a statement to the media, Mr. Jaitly, said the report was ``completely false'' and ``extremely defamatory''. Asked if he had sought an apology from the magazine prior to going to court, Mr. Jaitly said he had not done so because the report was ``categorical''. The charge, he said, was reported not as an allegation but as a fact. The magazine denied any knowledge of the case. A representative of its legal cell said they had not received court summons or any other intimation.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|