![]() Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003 |
| National | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Legal Correspondent
A vacation bench, comprising Justice R.C. Lahoti and Justice Brijesh Kumar, passed the order. Petitioner, S. Mohammad Ali, contended that the alleged prejudicial activities and the purpose of detention had been snapped in view of the delay in executing the order of detention. Further, the State Government while disposing of one of the five representations sent by the petitioner had not explained the delay in executing the order. The petitioner's counsel contended that the High Court direction not to consider four of the five petitions, on the ground that the authorities had administrative work, was contrary to the judgment of a Constitution bench of the apex court. The bench observed that so long as the first representation was not disposed of, the petitioner was entitled to send more representations and set aside the High Court order. The bench asked the State not to arrest the petitioner till the four representations were disposed of. It also granted liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition filed by him against the State Government's order rejecting the first representation, with liberty to move the High Court against that order. By an order dated January 30, the Madras High Court directed the Tamil Nadu Government to consider only the first representation. In the special leave petition against this order, the petitioner contended that the four representations were in the nature of applications for revocation under Sec. 11 of the COFEPOSA and the authorities were bound to consider all the five representations.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|