![]() Friday, Jul 04, 2003 |
| Front Page | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Front Page
By Our Special Correspondent
Addressing a `meet the press' here, Mr. Singhal said Mr. Vajpayee was the only person in the Sangh Parivar opposed to the building of the temple. ``If he was one of us, he would have built the temple,'' he claimed.Mr. Singhal said the National Democratic Alliance, a secular conglomerate, had ``finished off'' the BJP and its agenda. ``The BJP had promised to build the temple and bring in legislation for the same. It was not a simple issue. If they do not have a majority, let them go to the masses again,'' Mr. Singhal said. The Kanchi Sankaracharya should refrain from talking to the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board for a settlement of the Ayodhya issue. His initiative was an ``injustice'' to the Hindu community. The Board did not believe in the Constitution, he alleged. Mr. Singhal said the Acharya had ``no formula'' for the Ram lala or the spot identified as the Ramjanmabhoomi. Besides, his initiative did not have the ``backing of the sadhus and acharyas''. The Acharya should not have gone to the Board with folded hands for getting their ``no-objection'' for construction of the temple.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|