![]() Saturday, Aug 02, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, Though the Supreme Court has called on Parliament to enact a uniform civil code, I fail to see how it will help promote national integration. Personal laws deal largely with marriage, divorce, inheritance and other family and property-related matters. And, if the laws laid down by a religion are not progressive, it is the community that suffers and not the nation. Certain personal laws that govern divorce and alimony may be discriminatory to women of a community. But, any call for change should come from within the community. Any attempt at forcing a common civil code will only result in more fissures in society.
R. Venkatesan Iyengar,
* * * Sir, Evolving a common civil code is a constitutional directive. The process has so far been delayed on the plea that only when there is a consensus among the minorities, there can be a common civil code. How can anyone who opposes a common civil code be considered secular?
K. Ramachandra Rao,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|