![]() Tuesday, Aug 12, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, K. K. Katyal has reasoned that since the framers of the Constitution preferred accountability to stability, synchronising elections leading to a fixed tenure irrespective of the performance of the Government would go against the basic philosophy of the Constitution ( Aug. 11 ). But today most of the Governments are neither truly representative of the people nor responsible. Both stability and accountability can be ensured only by ushering in a party-less democracy.
P. Vijayaraghavan,
Sir, For over 20 years after Independence, we had simultaneous elections to Parliament and State Assemblies. We have reached a stage when we have frequent elections. There is nothing wrong in the suggestion of the Deputy Prime Minister and the Vice-President for simultaneous elections. One should not see a hidden agenda whenever something is suggested by BJP leaders.
A. Manian,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|