![]() Wednesday, Sep 17, 2003 |
| International | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
The Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the use of punch card ballots in six counties would disenfranchise thousands of voters. The counties that would include Los Angeles the State's most populous are said to have accounted for some 44 per cent of the registered voters in the 2000 election. The court did not set a firm date but might opt for March 2, 2004 the date of the State's presidential primary as suggested earlier by the American Civil Liberties Union. It stayed its ruling for a week to allow appeals to the Supreme Court which many groups are planning to do. The Republican candidate, Arnold Schwarzenegger, took a swipe at the ruling saying that the decision impacted on thousands of voters who signed the recall petition. "With this ruling, you risk disenfranchising voters. Does this serve the interests of democracy or the general public?" a spokesman for the Hollywood star asked. Analysts say a postponement until next March is bound to benefit the Governor, Gray Davis, who is at the centre of this recall storm; and for two reasons. First, a presidential primary will bring out a large number of Democrats to the polls; and it gives Mr. Davis extra time to tighten up the act on the budget crisis front.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|