Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Jan 08, 2002

About Us
Contact Us
Education Published on Tuesdays

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Entertainment | Young World | Folio |

Education

Where teaching serves as a catalyst...

In today's era of globalisation, a dramatic transformation in the field of law holds significant implications for legal education and the legal profession in India... Our law graduates will need expertise and skills that will aid them in meeting the professional challenges of the future. And this will depend not solely on their ability to learn and assimilate legal information, but also on the strength of the study materials and methods of instruction they are exposed to.

THE INTRODUCTION of the five-year integrated law course in the late 80s has resulted in some improvement in the quality of legal education. This five-year course was inspired by the U.S. legal education model and is broadly patterned on it. Casebooks and the case method of instruction are the hallmarks of American legal education.

Although many institutions offering the five-year integrated course have the case method of instruction as the ideal, it has not yet become an integral feature of our system. Interestingly, casebooks and the case method of instruction are not modern innovations. Indeed, they were created and introduced by Christopher C. Langdell, the Dean of the Harvard Law School in 1870.

What are casebooks and what is the case method of instruction? Textbooks or course books that are used in American law schools are called casebooks. And they derive their name from their contents.

A typical casebook includes readings, carefully selected excerpts of judicial decisions so that students/readers get the judges' reasoning without getting mired in procedural details, and introductions that set the cases or readings in a legal historical and political context.

Notes, comments and questions appear either before or after each reading or case that offer a variety of perspectives and challenge the students/readers to think about the judges' creative thinking and the extent to which the cases either follow precedent or break new ground. In short, casebooks are not descriptive but analytical in nature.

A natural corollary of using an analytical textbook such as a casebook is that the professor has to adopt a teaching strategy that includes asking students questions, having them discuss a judicial opinion or other materials used in the casebook and challenging them to predict how a court would decide a case similar to, but slightly different from, the cases in the course book. This necessitates that the students read the relevant chapter beforehand, think about the issues raised therein and come prepared to class.

The professor also needs to have strong analytical skills since he/she has to pose skilfully framed hypothetical cases to draw out the significance of the cases (in the course book) or to extend or limit the scope of the doctrine under discussion.

The teaching session is therefore not a monologue but a dialogue. This is, in sum, the Socratic or the case method of instruction that is prevalent in American law schools. Clearly, casebooks and the case method of instruction are powerful pedagogical tools since they contribute to training the "legal mind" and inculcating in students the habit of rigorous and critical analysis — behaviour that is integral to a lawyer's job.

Casebooks are valuable study aids since students gain practice in briefing cases, i.e. dissecting and analysing cases, weighing and appraising material, independent thinking and the skill of self-learning. The case method of teaching serves as a catalyser and reinforces critical thinking in students since they are not reduced to being passive recipients of information in class.

Furthermore, this style of teaching places some responsibility on students to think even while taking down notes in class. The format of law school exams in the U.S. in turn demands and rewards such analytical thinking of students since they are required to bring their knowledge to bear on a complex problem.

What the examiner looks for is not memorised knowledge, but the ability to apply the knowledge to a new problem or use that knowledge as a basis of thinking about new facts or new issues. Unfortunately, descriptive and non-analytical textbooks and cheap ``question and answer'' study guides are the only learning aids available to most Indian law students.

In some institutions what is passed off under the stylish name of a ``casebook'' is not intellectually rigorous: it is simply a collection of excerpts of leading judicial decisions arranged either alphabetically or chronologically!

So far as teaching is concerned, the lecture method remains the dominant mode of instruction in Indian law colleges. And even if a professor were to pose a few questions to students in class, the teaching style does not come anywhere close to the case method of instruction.

Since students are not required to come prepared to class, they are assigned a passive role and copy down as notes the information given by the professor. Even where exams pose hypothetical problems, they are not intellectually stimulating. They do not contain elaborate fact patterns that test students' abilities to spot the relevant issues and the applicable rules, to discriminate between relevant and irrelevant facts and to show how the issues inhere in the stipulated facts. Where problems are given, students are merely asked to cite to and discuss the relevant cases, not apply those cases in solving the problems.

Unfortunately those at the helm of legal education have not yet recognised the direct correlation between the quality of the methods and materials of our education system and the competence levels of our graduates.

Students trained on a diet of cheap guides, descriptive books and predictable essay type questions will have no practice in reading and briefing cases, synthesising rules from a series of cases or independently preparing a legal analysis — skills that are crucial to functioning as a competent lawyer.

Mention must be made in this regard of the first Indian textbook modelled on the American casebook, Environmental Law and Policy in India — Cases, Materials and Statutes. Dr. Armin Rosencranz, a Stanford University professor and Shyam Diwan, an Indian lawyer who had taken an LLM at the University of California, Berkeley, have co-authored this excellent textbook. Their casebook consists of a skilfully chosen and well-critiqued collection of environmental cases, statutory and analytical materials. It is a boon for Indian law students since it leaves no scope for memorising, but fosters critical reasoning, analytical thinking and the skill of self-learning. Also, it lends itself to be used as a teaching aid for the case method of instruction.

There is a dire need for this type of an analytical textbook for virtually all the Indian law subjects. Talented professors must be given study leave and provided financial and administrative support to prepare such casebooks.

Judges and leading members of the bar also have a responsibility to give their time and expertise to such much-needed pedagogic endeavours and if possible, even participate in them. Only books of this type should be prescribed in the curriculum and as more of them appear on the scene, descriptive books should be completely phased out.

Workshops need to be conducted to expose law teachers to the concept of the case method of instruction and the rationale for its adoption.

In today's era of globalisation a dramatic transformation is taking place in the field of law and legal and financial institutions. Lawyers everywhere are on the cutting edge of those developments. This rapidly changing scenario holds significant implications for legal education and the legal profession in India.

Our law graduates will need expertise and skills that will aid them in meeting the professional challenges of the future. And this will depend not solely on their ability to learn and assimilate legal information, but also on the strength of the study materials and methods of instruction they are exposed to.

A discernible improvement in the competence levels of our future lawyers is possible only if we prioritise formulating and introducing high quality study materials such as the case books and the method of instruction such as the Socrates or the case method of instruction in our education system.

VIJAYASHRI SRIPATHI

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Education

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Entertainment | Young World | Folio |



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Comments to : thehindu@vsnl.com   Copyright © 2002, The Hindu
Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu