|
T H E H I N D U O P P O R T U N I T I E S A Guide to Better Positions and Better Performance Wednesday, August 09, 2000 |
| Articles | Position wise | Category wise | Company wise | Location wise | Search Jobs | Home | | The Hindu Group |
HRD COUNSELLING HRD Talk
Govind Menon is general manager, IT content, with `the
managementor.com' and was formerly the content manager for India
Times.com and Cyber Media.
PROSAICALLY, YOUR readers need to be contented. On the Internet,
content is king. However, be that as it may, its not sparkling
prose or fancy graphics are easy to generate, or integrate into
the site the way you want them to. So, what can you do to plug
the gaps?
As a content provider, we know that generating usable, readable
content can be a true nightmare. This opinion is shared by
magazine editors, book publishers, and even those unfortunates
responsible for in- company newsletters. Finding grammatically
correct, well-researched content that will be interesting to the
target audience is hard. Making your colleagues prepare it in a
usable, publishable format may be next to impossible.
From experience, we see that most Web site developers fail to
adequately think through the content needs during the site
development period. All too often, it is (wrongly) assumed by the
content team that the primary contributors such as the CEO and
senior management, product managers, or even public relations
have a constant stream of engaging, interesting words that will
keep a visitor captivated. Reality is that content takes a
backseat in the face of more pressing management and technical
issues.
To ensure that you site succeeds, and brings in the "eyeballs,"
you need to ensure that the content presented is vibrant,
interesting, and most importantly, readable. The object remains
the same regardless of what the site is selling - subscriptions,
products, or advertising. The primary goal is not to sell the
product; instead it is to inform visitors and sublimely create a
user community.
Newspapers, radio and television faced the same problem. They
found a solution: syndication. This ensures that you can have the
latest content, often in real time, at a fraction of the cost of
generating it in- house. And if some visitors will have read your
content elsewhere, we think they're in the minority. After all,
you can never please everybody all the time!
The classic syndication model remains a wire service teleprinter
clattering away in a corner, spewing reams of paper on the floor.
Online content aggregators have morphed this model onto the
Internet. Using an infomediary, they feed you with updated news,
features, cartoons and even multimedia (streamed audio and video)
feeds. You don't even need to program in a complex code; the
aggregator sends you a link that you embed on your site. This
link is often a small script that queries the host site at a pre-
set interval and presents the content to your visitors.
Freshness is the major factor that drives online content
syndication. It's infomediaries like iSyndicate or Moreover, add
value to the basic package. They offer additional metadata,
including keywords and in-content searches. The tools are not
esoteric either. Today, XML and Java Script are the most popular
code generation languages. Equally popular are band-end engines
that use keywords to feed stories into an HTML template. The best
part about content aggregations from such sources is you visitors
view content from a diverse range of sources. We can certify that
syndicate content has revealed some very interesting, previously
unknown news, and news sources.
Right now most Web syndicators offer two levels of service: free
and subscription-based. In the former, you have no control over
the content beyond selection of a specific category such as
entertainment or technology. Free content can be a day old, a
week, or even a month old! In the paid model, you are billed on
the number of sources you subscribe to. You can choose which
feeds you want in each category, and the frequency of update -
hourly or daily.
Readers are probably wondering if there's a catch. There is; the
content streamed to your site is just a link. This link when
clicked on by a visitor takes them to a customised page on their
site. You customise the page, but the hits (or visits by a
browser) are credited to the syndicater. However, they do share
advertising revenues received with you on a 50:50 basis.
There is a third type of content syndicater making an appearance
as the game matures. Here, you pay extra to have the content
hosted on your site. One day down the road we'll probably see
online bidding for content.
The biggest casualty of old content is stickiness: making
visitors stay on your site for as long as possible. Did you know
that even the best sites like Yahoo or MSN have trouble keeping
users interested? According to Neilsen Net Ratings, the average
home surfer spent 53 seconds on a Web page! The average Yahoo
user spent just an hour in total over 30 days. AOL's rating were
worse; 12 minutes per week.
If the best online properties have such dismal ratings, it must
be a fickle world. Still, stickiness means that you keep visitors
interested enough to stay at your site and do many things. Sites
like Yahoo and AOL offer a search engine, along with communities,
free Web pages, chat and email, shopping, entertainment and more.
If your content teams are feeling a bit left out, they need not
be so. Syndicated content can never really address all your
visitors. That's where the in-house content crew step in and
create focused, niche area features that includes analyses and
opinions on what they feel is the best deal for the visitor.
The immediacy of the Internet creates an expectation of real time
(fresh) information constantly updated to reflect changes. That's
the tough part; keeping abreast of matters as they happen. There
is hope: most news syndicators and even venerable wire agencies
like AP, Reuters, and PTI in India offer special news feeds. You
can also subscribe to a service like NewsBytes
(http://www.newsbytes.com). iSyndicate
(http;//www.isyndicate.com) is an excellent content resource. As
is Moreover (http://www.moreover.com) which at last count had
nearly 1,000 different news feeds; most of them free.
When looking for an infomediary or a syndication service, it is
important that their delivery mechanisms and technology will
seamlessly integrate with yours. And you should always "ramp-up"
- starting small and then adding content on the way. If you are
working with a fixed and not-so-flexible budget, look for the
free aggregators. Once the "hits' start building and your
revenues increase, consider a lower-end paid package. Multimedia
is a sure stickiness builder; if only for the time it takes and
the willingness by visitors to wait for quality content to
download.
Don't forget that good editorial judgment is still required. If
you don't know who your visitors are, how do you expect to
develop content for them? Once the visitors start arriving, you
need to stay ahead of the competition to ensure your visitors
stay at your site, and not go elsewhere. It is a delicate tight
rope act, but if you know what you want and where to get it from,
you too can keep those eyeballs glued to your content.
GOVIND MENON
gmenon@mailstart.com
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu. |