Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Jun 10, 2002

About Us
Contact Us
Metro Plus Hyderabad Published on Mondays, Tuesdays & Thursdays

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Entertainment | Young World | Quest | Folio |

Metro Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Delhi    Hyderabad    Kochi    Thiruvananthapuram   

History through Bollywood eyes


BETTER FILM: Ajay Devgan and Amrita Rao

The Legend of Bhagat Singh (HINDI)

Cast: Ajay Devgan, Sushant, Amrita Rao

Dir: Raj Kumar Santoshi

23 March 1931 Shaheed (HINDI)

Cast: Bobby Deol, Aishwarya Rai

Dir: Guddu Dhanoa

ONE OF the paradoxes of Indian history writing has been an obsession with individuals with a certain political preference. As a result, children in school know everything about the foundation of the Congress in 1885, Mahatma Gandhi's comeback from South Africa, the Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience Movements and even the Khilafat and Quit India agitation. They are familiar with the names of Gandhi, Nehru, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. The same children in the same chapters in the same class are also told, almost perfunctorily though, that besides the moderates of Congress who wanted freedom with non-violent agitation, there were others. They had taken the path of violence. They were extremists. Or revolutionary terrorists. Thus we come across terms like Kakori Train Robbery or Dacoity for the soul-stirring deeds of men like Ramprasad Bismil and Ashfaqullah. We are also told that the likes of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Rajguru, Jatin Das and countless others were revolutionary terrorists. Sad.

Under this light, the two films on Bhagat Singh which were released this week should go some way in restoring the balance. Unfortunately, neither Rajkumar Santoshi's The Legend of Bhagat Singh nor Guddu Dhanoa's Shaheed comes even close to being memorable. Worse, both directors have taken liberties with the life and times of one of the greatest heroes of our Independence movement. Agreed both the films are dramatised versions but facts, unlike subjective opinions, are sacrosanct. The errors which have crept into both the productions in the rush to out-do the other to the box office are unpardonable. For instance, in Santoshi's film when Bhagat Singh and his comrades set out to exact revenge, they kill Scotts instead of Saunders! Similarly, in Dhanoa's Shaheed at the end,

Bhagat Singh is almost passed off as a believer in a subtle manner. Asked before going to the guillotine to read Guru Granth Sahib for once, he refuses but says "God lives in the heart!" Bhagat Singh, needless to reiterate, was not a believer. Not till his last breath.

Similarly, Chandrashekhar Azad died fighting the British. He did not fall prey to their bullets. Also, Bhagat Singh's constant slogan in life was Inquilaab Zindabad. However, if you were to watch Shaheed, for long stretches, the director would have us believe, that it was Vande Mataram.

Yet film to film, Santoshi's is the better film with clearly etched out characters of Sukhdev and Rajguru besides Jatin Das and Batukeshvar Dutt. Not to forget Chandrashekhar Azad.

Ajay Devgan gives a restrained and credible performance as Bhagat Singh. Gone is the swagger one associates with him. Gone too is the sulking lover-boy look. Instead, we get a largely finished performance from him. Again, he scores over Bobby Deol in a parallel role in Shaheed.

There are a couple of surprise packets in The Legend of Bhagat Singh. The first one is Sushant Saxena. The man has a fine screen presence, good timing and an ability to hold his own in front of more celebrated actors. As Sukhdev, he does not lose out much in comparison with Devgan's Bhagat Singh. Also, watch out for Amrita Rao. Covered from head-to-toe as the revolutionary's never-to-be-wife, she brings a certain grace and understated elegance to her walk-on role.


ACTION HERO: Bobby Deol and Aishwarya Rai.

Shaheed, on the other hand, would have us believe, that Bhagat Singh either operated in isolation or his worthy comrades like Sukhdev and Rajguru were mere acolytes. That is neither true to history nor to the followers of these brave men. Not even to Bhagat Singh. He was a great figure, he does not need bonus points from history to exalt him. Glorifying Bhagat Singh while belittling others of no mean stature is a travesty.

Yes, history, at times, maybe a prisoner to posterity's ideological predilections.

But it is no mistress to a man's whims. Dhanoa and his comrades should realise that. In their zeal to cater to the commercial cinema audience, they have reduced Bhagat Singh almost to an action film hero mouthing loud dialogues, speaking in high decibel level and breaking into a song whenever faced with adversity.

Short of dancing, Bobby's Bhagat Singh does everything that Bobby would have done in countless other films.

ZIYA US SALAM

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Metro Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Delhi    Hyderabad    Kochi    Thiruvananthapuram   

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Entertainment | Young World | Quest | Folio |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Comments to : thehindu@vsnl.com   Copyright © 2002, The Hindu
Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu