Back National
By Our Special Correspondent
In a statement today, Mr. Tarigami said that in the report to R.S. Gupta, Commissioner of Police, Delhi, the Directorate of Military Intelligence, in a report on December 12, had clearly stated that the documents found in Mr. Geelani's possession were of "negligible security value''. It also said that its earlier adverse report was an "erroneous overestimate of the sensitivity of the documents.'' A copy of this letter was also sent to Neeraj Kumar, Joint Commissioner of Police, Special Cell (Intelligence). The document referred to by Mr. Tarigami was placed before the District and Sessions Judge, Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, on Friday by Mr. Geelani's counsel, as proof that the police had fabricated an adverse report which they claimed was from the Directorate of Military Intelligence. The report that the police had produced in court was a letter signed by an Under-Secretary in the Ministry of Home and addressed to Mr. Kumar, which reproduced an earlier Army report.
© Copyright 2000 - 2009 The Hindu |