Back National
By Our Legal Correspondent
A Bench, comprising Justice B.N. Agrawal and Justice A.R. Lakshmanan, issued notice after hearing senior counsel for the petitioner, S. Ramachandra Rao, who contended that these provisions were unconstitutional as they violated Article 19 (1) (a), viz., right to the freedom of speech and expression. Mr. Rao submitted that in the case, ``Rajagopal vs State of Tamil Nadu'', the apex court had not decided the question of impact of the freedom of press guaranteed under Article 19 (1) and section 499 IPC defamation law made under the colonial government in the 19th century. He said the court had made only a passing reference in the case regarding the constitutional validity of Section 499 IPC. The Bench after examining the case decided to take this matter into consideration and hence ordered notice to the Centre. According to the appellant, criminal defamation proceedings were initiated against him and others in respect of an article published in the newspaper in 1996 and it ended in payment of fine. Even as the proceedings were pending, the appellant moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court challenging Sec. 499. The High Court rejected the petition and the present SLP was directed against this judgment dated January 25, 2002.
© Copyright 2000 - 2009 The Hindu |