Back
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
This refers to the article “Needed, a renewed socialist concern” (Feb. 5). Socialism achieved some degree of human dignity but did not create wealth. As pointed out by Alan Greenspan, once the German wall came down the result of laissez faire and a federally-controlled system was there for all to see. The difference between East and West Germany was too conclusive to be ignored. We cannot compare with Latin American countries because the success they have achieved is not because of their economic models. Whatever their mistakes, the stupendous rise in oil prices takes care of them. It is the Nordic countries which have the best socially equitable system. The system allows entrepreneurship to create wealth, and governance that ensures the use of such wealth for the betterment of all. V. Rajan, Thiruvananthapuram A dispassionate study of socialism and capitalism will show that both have their plus points and weaknesses. Socialism provides for a more equitable distribution of the fruits of society, and capitalism scores in productivity and efficiency. While the former encourages mediocrity and complacency, the latter puts the masses at the mercy of market forces. The best way to take a country forward would be to combine the best of both. D. Balakrishnan, Coimbatore Dhruva Seshadri, Vellore © Copyright 2000 - 2009 The Hindu |