Back
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
This refers to Subramanian Swamy’s argument that just as we worship the sun god but don’t go to the sun, it does not matter whether we go to the middle of the sea to offer worship to the Ramar Sethu. There is no doubt that the religious sentiments of a billion people are involved in the Ramar Sethu issue. But the Sethusamudram Shipping Channel Project is also important for the economic uplift of Indians. Why can’t Dr. Swamy modify his plea to preserve the Ramar Sethu as a monument up to the point of alignment? A three to four-km stretch from the mainland to the sea, up to the sixth alignment, can be developed and beautified to suit the descriptions found in the Ramayana. The rest can be altered for the SSCP. This way, both sentiment and science can be satisfied. K. Venkata Rao, Pollachi S. Vidhyalalitha, Vellore When an alternative alignment is available for the SSCP, why should the government insist on breaching the Sethu and hurt the sentiments of millions of people? P.T. Kumar, Visakhapatnam Its demolition was the reflection of our inability to safeguard our secular democracy. On the other hand, Ramar Sethu is an article of faith. Let us leave it alone, and use the money saved on its demolition to rebuild the Babri Masjid. Koti Sreekrishna, Mason Ramar Sethu is an isthmus and a number of isthmuses exist in several parts of the world. A. Thirugnanasambantham, Coimbatore © Copyright 2000 - 2009 The Hindu |